| | [ Return to Bugs & Features | Roadmap 2.0 | Post Text | Post File ]
STR #543
| Application: | FLTK Library |
|---|
| Status: | 4 - Pending |
|---|
| Priority: | 1 - Request for Enhancement, e.g. asking for a feature |
|---|
| Scope: | 3 - Applies to all machines and operating systems |
|---|
| Subsystem: | Core Library |
|---|
| Summary: | can't change position of Fl_Input_ subclasses through position() |
|---|
| Version: | 2.0-current |
|---|
| Created By: | mberghma.pandora |
|---|
| Assigned To: | spitzak |
|---|
| Fix Version: | Unassigned |
|---|
| Update Notification: | |
|---|
Trouble Report Files:
[ Post File ]No files
Trouble Report Comments:
[ Post Text ]
| |
| #1 | mberghma.pandora
03:01 Sep 24, 2004 |
| The position(x, y) function of Fl_Widget is hidden in the Fl_Input_ class through 'function hiding'.
(The new function changes the cursor position.)
Now, to do a general layout change of e.g. a Fl_Output**, you can't use the position(x,y) anymore in the same way as other classes would, unless you use Fl_Widget::position(x,y) explicitly, or resize(x,y,w,h) (my current solution).
Since I find this confusing, and I don't think this is an intended feature, I was wondering if you could change the Fl_Input_ interface a little to make this work again...
Thanx
PS: maybe this happens in more than 1.1.5rc2 but that's te one I use now. | |
| |
| #2 | mike
06:35 Sep 24, 2004 |
| We can't change the API in 1.1.x, as that would break binary compatibility.
Reassigning to 2.0 where we may be able to change this (might, in fact, already be changed...) | |
| |
| #3 | spitzak
12:38 Sep 26, 2004 |
| Not fixed in 2.0 yet, but it should be. Probably the fix is to rename Input::position to something else, but I'm not sure what. cursor() sounds the best but there is already a Widget call by that name. Perhaps point() (ie there is a point() and a mark()). Or insertion_point()? Any other ideas?
| |
[ Return to Bugs & Features | Post Text | Post File ]
|
| |
FLTK Apps 
