FLTK logo

STR #3116

FLTK matrix user chat room
(using Element browser app)   FLTK gitter user chat room   GitHub FLTK Project   FLTK News RSS Feed  
  FLTK Apps      FLTK Library      Forums      Links     Login 
 Home  |  Articles & FAQs  |  Bugs & Features  |  Documentation  |  Download  |  Screenshots  ]
 

Return to Bugs & Features | Roadmap 1.3 | SVN ⇄ GIT ]

STR #3116

Application:FLTK Library
Status:1 - Closed w/Resolution
Priority:2 - Low, e.g. a documentation error or undocumented side-effect
Scope:3 - Applies to all machines and operating systems
Subsystem:Documentation
Summary:Rewrite of Article 825: what are the versions of FLTK?
Version:1.3-current
Created By:engelsman
Assigned To:engelsman
Fix Version:1.3-current
Update Notification:

Receive EMails Don't Receive EMails

Trouble Report Files:


Name/Time/Date Filename/Size  
 
#1 engelsman
08:49 Aug 01, 2014
article-825-rewrite.txt
3k
 
 
#2 engelsman
00:28 Aug 11, 2014
article-825-original.txt
5k
 
 
#3 engelsman
05:05 Aug 13, 2014
article-825-rewrite-v2.txt
5k
 
     

Trouble Report Comments:


Name/Time/Date Text  
 
#1 engelsman
08:49 Aug 01, 2014
There are links to Article 825 everywhere, so creating an new Article
isn't really an option, and as the Article database isn't a Wiki with
the opportunity for rollback, I thought I'd post a draft simplification
as an STR for comment instead. I'm offline for the next week and will
incorporate any comments and formatting in the main article when I get
back.

Should we delete the existing comments and start with a clean sheet?
 
 
#2 engelsman
05:07 Aug 13, 2014
Updated after comments from Ian and Greg in fltk.coredev  
 
#3 AlbrechtS
02:16 Aug 14, 2014
Regarding old comments: yes, I think they should be deleted. They would only add confusion. Direct link to article with comments:
http://www.fltk.org/articles.php?L825

One small correction, regarding FLTK 1.2:
"This was FLTK1.1.x..." should read "This was FLTK-1.1.x" for consistency reasons.

That said, +1 for article-825-rewrite-v2.txt.
 
 
#4 engelsman
04:39 Aug 18, 2014
I've updated the article with the v2 text, and tidied it up a bit further.

I've deleted my own comments, so their subcomments are invisible, but I can't delete the other two top-level comments, so I assume that their authors or the webadmin will need to do that.

D.
 
 
#5 greg.ercolano
16:40 Aug 20, 2014
Looks to me like the article's comments have been cleared..
Can this be closed?
 
 
#6 engelsman
23:43 Aug 20, 2014
Well I was going to wait two weeks to see whether there were any other comments about the final article text either here or on fltk.coredev, but as you, Ian and Albrecht have given it the +1 I guess the STR is fixed :-)

D.
 
 
#7 engelsman
23:48 Aug 20, 2014
The text of article 825 has been largely rewritten to reflect the current status of the different versions, and to address the user comments, which have now been removed.

The article is not under subversion, so there is no fix revision number!

D.
 
     

Return to Bugs & Features ]

 
 

Comments are owned by the poster. All other content is copyright 1998-2024 by Bill Spitzak and others. This project is hosted by The FLTK Team. Please report site problems to 'erco@seriss.com'.