|
|
Hence I believe we should now close this issue. Michael, is this OK for you?
Yes, please close if you don't want to add a replacement for "round()".
For my system I will test this replacement code:
static inline double round(double x) {
return (x >= 0) ? floor(x + 0.5) : ceil(x - 0.5);
}
— Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub, or unsubscribe. You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.Message ID: <fltk/fltk/issues/942/2018424275@github.com>
[ Direct Link to Message ] | |
|
| |