|
|
Woops, sorry for the typo. You are right, I actually mean Fl::visible_focus() rather than Fl::foucs() .
I agree with you that visible_foucs() should keep the behavior the same as before for backwards compatibility. I use the term visible_ for vison and enable_ for action , the two names are used for the purpose of distinguishing between vison and action . I should have explained in more detail.
— Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub, or unsubscribe. You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.Message ID: <fltk/fltk/issues/366/1578299325@github.com>
[ Direct Link to Message ] | |
|
| |