| |
| |
On 2/3/23 14:47, Pierre Jasmin wrote:
Maybe it should be the other way around, drafting a
version of C++ that only supports what FLTK does :)
Been programming C++ for 25+ years and some of the new
constructs when I look at the code I can barely say it's C++ :)
Heh, +1.
When STL was admitted as a standard, and all those keywords with
angle brackets and underbars
in the names started appearing, I thought "no way, this is
hacky/ugly/kludgy", and words that
made no sense. The word "static" is abused and overloaded too
much, and the STL API is just awful.
My favorite thing to hate is working with vectors (arrays?!),
appending to them (push_back!?)
and deleting items (v.erase(v.begin()+index?!) is just so damned
ugly.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "fltk.general" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to fltkgeneral+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/fltkgeneral/eeb0fdfc-0800-8de9-2508-76f032162b02%40seriss.com.
[ Direct Link to Message ] | |
|
| |
