| |
| |
On 10/29/21 7:33 PM Bill Spitzak wrote:
I don't have any problem with using std::vector, it was not used back
in the day because it used much more memory and was slower than naive
C implementations, but this is not true any more.
Bill, would you recommend to use std::vector inside the FLTK library? I
mean: inside, not in the public API.
Doing so could simplify code development for some new features where we
often need to maintain dynamic arrays. I know we discussed this several
times and there were some concerns (doubts) regarding compiler
compatibility and such.
As Ian mentioned in this thread, some implementations of containers
might pull in exceptions which we don't want. Do you have any insights
on this?
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "fltk.general" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to fltkgeneral+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/fltkgeneral/ef599b5c-d09d-35af-379f-9e60b874f6a8%40online.de.
[ Direct Link to Message ] | |
|
| |
