|
|
On Wed, 25 Nov 2020, 11:08 fischerlaender wrote:
Some more details: I'm building two standalone application bundles, one on my Intel Mac running Catalina, the other on the ARM Mac. I then copy the binary from the app bundle (xxx.app/Contents/MacOS/) on the ARM Mac to the Intel Mac where I use lipo to create a universal binary as explained before. This universal binary is then placed in the app bundled, replacing the existing Intel binary. I then sign and notarize this app bundle.
Thanks for letting us know. That's what I had inferred you were doing, from your earlier post, which is why I asked if you were building each binary natively...
If you have access to both architectures that may well be the easiest option.
Indeed, it would be handy to know if a fat-binary (including an arm M1 binary) can be built entirely on an x86_64 host, since that would go a long way to address the issues that David (w1hkj) is having I imagine.
As my Intel Mac is from 2012 and runs only Catalina, I haven't tried this. It should be possible as XCode 12.2 runs on Catalina, but I don't want to change my working scripts. You know: Never change a running system. :-)
Building on a single system would only save copying and pasting some simple command line commands, so I don't want to mess around with it.
Indeed so. Though I've generally found Xcode to have pretty good compatibility across versions so it might go smoothly!
Really I was just wondering how well the fat-binary process would work for those who only have an Intel Mac at present.
Like me: but mine is Too Old (10.13) which I do not think can support a "recent enough" Xcode to even try... -- Ian From my Fairphone FP3
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "fltk.general" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to fltkgeneral+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/fltkgeneral/CAGFM6dZ5fwVP0s0tmzgXdoZXuJEq-xpX8vROdGhxLd%3D_-m4cjA%40mail.gmail.com.
[ Direct Link to Message ] | |
|
| |