| |
| |
Sorry, sent this to the wrong address initially... --
Ian
From my Fairphone FP3
---------- Forwarded message --------- From: imm <imacarthur@gmail.com>Date: Mon, 23 Nov 2020, 14:53 Subject: Re: [fltk.general] Fwd: [linuxham] Test suite for macOS BigSur To: w1hkj < w1hkj@bellsouth.net> On Mon, 23 Nov 2020, 14:07 w1hkj, wrote:
Single target dmg. Only
contains x86_64 code. No G4 and no i386. I still have a G4
mini and a 22 year old G4 desktop (tank). Both in the closet.
David
On 11/23/20 8:00 AM, imm wrote:
For the record; is that a fat-binary on the M1 or
is it Rosetta?
If it's Rosetta, do we know if a fat-binary
works?
That said, I haven't built a fat-binary since my
G4 went into the attic...
Yes, I just saw the crash report; just x86_64.
Anybody know how the fat builds work these days? Can a x86_64 Mac (cross-)compile for the M1 and build a fat-binary?
If so, be very interesting to find out whether that works or not... --
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "fltk.general" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to fltkgeneral+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/fltkgeneral/CAGFM6dYzcQvtKgNV8zpAGc6ME6mVVGiifi858m40_OHAq5LhWw%40mail.gmail.com.
[ Direct Link to Message ] | |
|
| |
