|
|
No problem here, I'd be fine with plot_char(), if that's preferred
by you and others.
On 4/4/24 19:15 Greg Ercolano wrote:
Holding for a reply from Albrecht, as he's the one that didn't
like the 'plot' idea.
I do think plot is the better choice given the x,y args and the
"does not affect the
cursor position" behavior. (Confusion about pen plotter behavior
seems like a stretch)
I also give weight to Bill's opinion because he gifted us FLTK.
But I'm open to whatever you guys (or anyone else) can agree on,
and will
implement that.
On 4/3/24 00:20, Bill Spitzak wrote:
I would really expect "putchar" or any variation
to actually act like that character was typed on the terminal,
including handling ESC and CR, etc. And moving the cursor.
A "plotchar" would take an x,y position, imho
I guess overloading could still use the same name as the
position makes the argument list different.
On
4/2/24 18:08 Greg Ercolano wrote:
>
> Heh, I was thinking more of plotting pixels.
>
> But if people actually remember what plotters (with
pens) are,
> then put_char() it shall be.
+1
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups "fltk.coredev" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it,
send an email to fltkcoredev+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/fltkcoredev/6b58a150-4a78-4618-8e95-dbdde2caadf1%40seriss.com.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "fltk.coredev" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to fltkcoredev+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/fltkcoredev/9578bad2-1a1d-4989-93bf-cea1e1fe8237%40aljus.de.
[ Direct Link to Message ] | |
|
| |