> El 8 dic. 2021, a las 04:40, Manolo <manolo.gouy@gmail.com> escribió:
> 
> The doc of Fl::repeat_timeout() states :
> "You may only call this method inside a timeout callback of the same timer or at least a closely related timer, otherwise the timing accuracy can't be improved and the behavior is undefined."
> 
> In your code, the timeout callback function is mrv::static_timeout(), which calls at some point ImageView::timeout() which does Fl::repeat_timeout().
> 
> The question is what happens between the beginnings of mrv::static_timeout() and of ImageView::timeout() ?

Nothing.  Static timeout calls view->timeout() on the Imageview class.

> If the event loop runs in between, then another timeout event can be triggered, and chaos arises.
> ¿ Do you call Fl::wait(), Fl::flush(), Fl::check() within mrv::static_timeout()  or functions it calls ?
> If yes, that would be in contradiction to the correct use of Fl::repeat_timeout().
> 

No.

—
Gonzalo Garramuno
ggarra13@gmail.com




-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "fltk.coredev" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to fltkcoredev+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/fltkcoredev/8856BFD1-8C93-46CA-9AB5-A5ABF8BD0977%40gmail.com.