FLTK logo

Re: [fltk.coredev] Vote about using antialiased lines and curves on the Windows platform

FLTK matrix user chat room
(using Element browser app)   FLTK gitter user chat room   GitHub FLTK Project   FLTK News RSS Feed  
  FLTK Apps      FLTK Library      Forums      Links     Login 
 All Forums  |  Back to fltk.coredev  ]
 
Previous Message ]New Message | Reply ]Next Message ]

Re: Vote about using antialiased lines and curves on the Windows platform Albrecht Schlosser May 22, 2021  
 
On 5/21/21 11:36 PM Ian MacArthur wrote:
On 21 May 2021, at 22:12, Albrecht Schlosser wrote:
On 5/21/21 9:57 PM Ian MacArthur wrote:
On 21 May 2021, at 13:11, Albrecht Schlosser wrote:
I'd also like to see an option to switch drivers (GDI <-> GDI+) dynamically so users can maybe switch back to pure old GDI in time-critical drawing paths (somebody mentioned this, IIRC). This option might already exist (internally) but I don't know if there's an API to be easily applied. If so, it should be documented.
I have no idea if this is even feasible?
We’ve never really had support for changing the back-end dynamically at runtime, though, have we? It’s always been a build-time sort of option.
Changing the "driver" during runtime is well-established. Think of offline drawing, Fl_Printer, and whatnot.


OK, yes, this is true. I think I expressed myself poorly here... in essence, I think that GDI and GDI+ are “the same” driver, but have somewhat different internal paths for the rendering. It is this internal path that we would have to change dynamically, and I do not think that is a thing we do at present, changing the internals of the driver to use a different back-end during runtime...?

The GDI and GDI+ drivers are different classes. The GDI+ driver is derived from the GDI driver and defines its own virtual methods. IMHO the only part we don't have yet is that at initialization time only one of these two drivers is instantiated which is done by #ifdef'ed code. If we managed to instantiate both drivers and assign the "correct one" at any time we can presumably switch drivers as we like. Another problem I can see may be the driver's (i.e. GDI vs. GDI+) internal Windows context but I don't know anything about that.

Note that this view is partially backed by viewing the current source code (virtual driver methods) but other parts are just educated guesses and may be oversimplified.

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "fltk.coredev" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to fltkcoredev+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/fltkcoredev/d91950ff-243d-2db9-deb9-01fb3d7ab1a0%40online.de.
Direct Link to Message ]
 
     
Previous Message ]New Message | Reply ]Next Message ]
 
 

Comments are owned by the poster. All other content is copyright 1998-2024 by Bill Spitzak and others. This project is hosted by The FLTK Team. Please report site problems to 'erco@seriss.com'.