|
|
> In article <25087-fltk.general-+FT6Wyec2gCDR8wcTNDzOQ@public.gmane.org>,
> didomax <iprmaster-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org> wrote:
>
> > Hi everybody,
> >
> > I have got a xforms application (a flow visualisation tool) and I want to
> > port it to a better GUI toolkit.
> >
> > Is fltk a cheap solution? Can I port my code with minor changes to this
> > (nice-looking) GUI? I have read that fltk is supposed to be a xforms
> > successor.
> >
> > I am aware that this is a (very) general question, but I am not allowed to
> > publish the target code. If you need more infos, let me know...
>
> Not at all!
>
> FLTK has an xforms compatibility layer which is enabled by default
> (meaning that most of the times, you just rebuild and your application
> is using FLTK).
Perfect! I am going to try it as soon as possible (Easter is coming) and I will let you know about the results.
>
> You should be able to port your existing code with minimal effort.
>
> You can also intermix xforms and FLTK calls during your transition for a
> progressive learning curve.
>
That's a nice feature, I hope the use of fltk will improve my application.
Thanks a lot,
Max
[ Direct Link to Message ] | |
|
| |