|
|
It might be the font we've chosen.. I think one of the fonts looks
like a 'condensed' version of the font (in width), vs the other
where the letters look 'fat' and 'wide'.
This might just be a wacky font on the platform I was working on
at the time, which I think was a fedora 3 system that I think I still have.
Matthias Melcher wrote:
>
> Looking at STR 2456, there seems to be a general font scale issue. I know that we never insisted on a perfect font size, assuming that the font "height" is supposed to be set. But having learned much more about fonts than I ever wanted, I now know that there are many different meanings to the "height" of a font.
>
> So what's a poor developer to do?
>
> - first, we need to define what exactly we mean by font "height", right?
> - then we need to find the function on all platforms that returns the same values for the same (TT) font
> - finally, we have to find out how to *request* the desired font height
>
> That all should give use a better result, but it still does not guarantee that the *width* and layout will be the same on every platform... .
>
> Sigh.
--
Greg Ercolano, erco-LFyj+9PUM9jQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org
Seriss Corporation
Rush Render Queue, http://seriss.com/rush/
Tel: +1 626-576-0010 ext.23
Fax: +1 626-576-0020
Cel: +1 310-266-8906
[ Direct Link to Message ] | |
|
| |